Chairman's Message and Articles

International Roundup - Vol 18, No 3

Table of Contents Roundup News Chairman's Message and Articles Coming Events
Member Reports Book Reviews Labor and Structural Steel Prices ICEC Home Page
Chairman's Message and Articles

Please note: All diagrams are in the pdf versions of the papers. These are not always included in the html version.

ICEC Chairman's Message

Verster, Professor JJP (Basie)
Message from the Chairman (Link to PDF version.)

Feature and Technical Articles

Hanscomb
Rating Sustainability, How Green is your building? in Hanscomb Means Report, International Construction Intelligence Vol 17, No 4, July / August 2005
Humphreys, Dr Kenneth K
Cost engineering for projects (in a worldwide economy) - Paper presented at the 3rd SENET Project Management Confernece, Slovakia, September 2004. (Link to PDF version.)
Vlach, Jirí
Public-private partnership as a basis of the development of public procurement - Paper presented at the 2004 SENET Conference, Slovakia, September 2004. (Link to PDF version.)

Click here to return to top of screen


Message from the Chairman

ICEC Chairman Basie Verster

Introduction

As members know by now, the next ICEC international world congress will be held in the beautiful city of Ljubljana, Slovenia between 23 and 26 April 2006 and ICEC members must prepare themselves for this wonderful opportunity to be informed about the latest tendencies in the world of cost engineering, project management and quantity surveying, and to establish their influence and reinforce the network and skills of the ICEC society.


The Congress: "Value management - How to ensure value from project stakeholders"

Brane Semolic, president of the Slovenian Project Management Association and his team are planning an event that attendees shall never forget in a country of beauty, history and tradition. I am sure that this will be an event one should try not to miss.

The seven pre-congress workshops promise to cater for most professionals in relevant fields. On Saturday 22 April 2006, four workshops will cover quantity surveying, cost engineering, risk and project management, while the three workshops on Sunday will deal with project- and value management and professional development, all presented by experts in their fields of study and practice.

During the three days of the Congress itself, plenary sessions will address important contributions professions can make to stakeholders towards value ensurance, while the seven topic tracks also included in the programme will be aimed at value-, risk- and project management, quantity surveying, cost engineering, strategic management and professional development.

The following deadlines and information is important:

Meeting and events

The following meetings will be held during or before the Congress:

  • ICEC Council;
  • SENET;
  • SIG;
  • Young Project Management Crew;
  • Academic Forum; and
  • Habitat Forum.

Member associations, members of members and interested parties are invited to start arranging their visit to this very special event.

Activities of ICEC

The activities within ICEC and member associations remain important. The following aspects will be addressed at the Congress in April 2006:

  • World Vision: The vision towards creating standards and practice for quality service world wide needs to be confirmed at the council meeting. This drive by the AIQS is one of the most important issues that will be discussed at the Congress in April 2006;
  • Housing: The role of ICEC in respect of the housing initiative will be discussed, Murtala Oladapo will report on the progress during the Congress;and
  • Education and research: Education and research activities within the ICEC stable are fundamental to maintain the credibility of ICEC. A forum will once again be arranged during the Congress to discuss progress in this regard.

Other foci

The following congresses and meetings are listed for your attention:

  • 13-16 November 2005 - The 19th IPMA World Congress to be held in New Delhi, India. The theme of the Congress is “Vision to Reality (V2R) – the project management way” ICEC will be participating in this Congress;
  • 24-24 November 2005 – The annual forum of the Italian Total Cost Management Society, held in Milano at Bocconi University. Although the forum shall mainly be held in Italian, papers are also welcome in English and French; and
  • 23-26 April 2006 – 5th World Congress on Cost Engineering, Project Management and Quantity Surveying and the 19th International Cost Engineering Congress, Cankarjev Dom Congress Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Contact Alenka Kregar by email;
  • 21-24 May 2006 – 10th Pacific Association of Quantity Surveyors Congress to be held in Singapore. Theme: “Advancing new frontiers”. First announcement and call for papers: http://www.sisv.org.sg/paqs.html Contact: paqs2006@sisv.org.au;
  • 18-24 June 2006 – AACE International 50th Annual Meeting to be held in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. Contact: info@aacei.org or look at AACEI web site. Annual ICEC Region 1 meeting will be held on 22 June during this conference; and
  • June 2007 – 11 Pacific Association of Quantity Surveyors Congress to beheld in Aukland, New Zealand. Theme: Construction from a different view” Contact: conf2007@nziqs.co.nz.

Professor JJP Verster
Chairman
International Cost Engineering Council


Click here to return to top of screen


Rating Sustainability - How Green is your building

Reprinted with permission from Hanscomb Means Report, International Construction Intelligence, Vol. 17, No. 4, July / August 2005

Oil prices topping USD 60 per barrel amid supply uncertainty and increasing demand tends to raise public awareness of energy conservation issues. Will the widespread economic pain of higher energy prices produce real long-term changes?

Rising energy prices propelled the energy conservation movement of the 1970s. Building energy efficiency increased during the last quarter of the twentieth century. However, who was more motivated to act; governments or consumers? Most observers would probably agree that government policies, regulations and incentives produced the greatest change.

Energy conservation is only one aspect of the bigger picture— sustainability or green building. Green building is a broad term integrating many interests and viewpoints. Its essence is reducing environmental impacts through a holistic approach to land use, building design and construction strategies. However, the economic affects of the broader environmental issues are not as directly noticeable to the building consumer as energy use.

Regional Emergeny Communications and Traffic Management Center

Growing Green

The green building movement is gaining momentum around the world. Some dare say it is moving to mainstream practice. This may be an overstatement, but there is little doubt of growing awareness among design professionals and building owners.

Some government policies and building regulations support aspects of the broader sustainability goals. However, the combined efforts of individuals in the property industry to move it towards sustainability are having remarkable effect. The World Green Building Council (WGBC) and the national Green Building Councils are examples.

Organizations promoting sustainability realized that an environmental assessment system is a powerful tool to help reach sustainability goals. Assessment systems provide a common set of criteria and targets and a verifiable method for assessing performance. They are an educational tool as the rating systems help raise public and professional awareness of environmental issues.

Assessment systems answer the essential question, "How do we know if our building is green?" A rating system provides a measure of 'greenness'. Also, do not underestimate the importance of an industry accepted stamp of approval.

Worldwide, there are many approaches to rating a building for its environmental impacts. (See sidebar) The WGBC holds the position that one tool does not fit all. Each country's assessment tool "meets the local market needs and is benchmarked against local practices and legislative precedents," according to Maria Atkinson, Executive Director of the Green Building Council of Australia.

"There is an emerging awareness that green buildings also create healthier work, learning, and living environments. This awareness of indoor environmental quality is lower than the understanding of energy or water efficiency," says Atkinson. The increased awareness of sustainable building as more than just meeting code requirements focusing on energy efficiency excites those involved in the green building movement.

Championing Green

As with any change, green building requires something to give it momentum and a champion.

"The Sydney Olympics provided an impetus for Australia to develop Green Building capability," notes Atkinson. "To sustain the achievements of the Olympics and provide further development, the industry urgently needed an agreed framework and methodology for building and measuring 'green'." Their response was founding the Green Building Council of Australia and developing its Green Star rating scheme.

S Srinivas, Senior Counsellor at the CII-Godrej Green Business Centre believes momentum began building in India when the USGBC awarded LEED Platinum rating to the CII-Godrej building in 2003. Since then, more than 30 buildings are pursuing or have received LEED rating. Interest is growing, but general awareness of green building is scarce. To further advance sustainable design in India, Srinivas believes they must "involve a critical mass of stakeholders" and "launch LEED India."

LEED—a voluntary method in the USA—relies on passionate, committed people to educate owners on the merits of green building, Through their efforts, some State and local governments have adopted LEED as a green building guideline for their building projects.

Bharat Patel, principal with DMJM, says early success for green was from "institutions and governments mandating LEED certified buildings." In 2001, the Los Angeles Community College District became an early pioneer requiring the 44 new buildings on the USD 2.23 billion bond program be LEED certified. After this, the City of Los Angeles adopted LEED. Then, the University of California adopted it, as did the State for all its buildings.

The government sector is leading the way in adopting green design for its projects. Government projects account for nearly 45 percent of all USGBC LEED registered projects. Government agencies may use the LEED guidelines, but they often choose not to pursue registration for certification.

In Australia, government leadership, by embracing the Green Star system, is found at various levels: State governments of Victoria and South Australia, the Department of Defence, city governments of Melbourne and Brisbane and the Sydney Olympic Park. In April, the GBC of Australia gave Melbourne's Council House 2 its first 6-star award —the highest Green Star rating.

Many new UK government office buildings are being required to achieve BREEAM Excellent. The Department of Education and Skills requires new schools achieve Very Good as a minimum.

Rating Tools

Organizations producing environmental assessment tools have similar overall concerns. However, different systems may well produce different results. A synopsis of a four rating systems is below.

BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method), UK Building Research Establishment (BRE). BRE developed the first tool for new offices in 1990. BREEAM tools are used or adapted by other countries. Assessment tools include offices, homes, industrial, retail and schools. BREEAM uses nine categories to assess building performance; management, energy use, health and well-being, pollution, transport, land use, ecology, materials, water. The tools award points for performance against criteria that are added together for an overall score to assign one of five possible ratings. BREEAM provides assessment opportunities for pre-design, design completion and occupied buildings.

LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), US Green Building Council (USGBC). The LEED assessment tools are voluntary, consensus-based national standards. The first assessment tool, covering New Construction, was developed in 2000. Current assessment tools include new commercial construction and major renovation, existing building operations, commercial interiors and core and shell. The USGBC is developing tools for homes and neighborhood development. LEED uses six categories: sustainable sites, water efficiency, energy and atmosphere, materials and resources, indoor environmental quality, innovation. Each category has specific design goals worth points—some are mandatory. Point totals earn projects one of four ratings.

Green Star (Green Building Council of Australia), Launched in 2003, Green Star drew from existing rating systems including BREEAM and LEED, but it is tailored to the Australian marketplace and environmental context. Green Star includes tools for office design, office as-built and office interiors. An office asset tool is in pilot study Planned tools include retail, health, residential and education. The tool uses ten categories:

energy, management, water, indoor environmental quality transport, ecology and land use, emissions, materials, innovation. Ratings (stars) have six levels, but only four are eligible for certification. Green Star uses category weighting factors that vary across states/territories to allow for differing environmental concerns and imperatives.

CASBEE (Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency), Japan Sustainable Building Consortium (JSBC). JSBC introduced a new buildings tool in 2002 and an existing buildings tool in 2004. Other tools include temporary construction and heat island. A renovation tool will be completed this year. JSBC plans tools for district, region, detached house and pre-design assessment. CASBEE uses four primary categories: energy efficiency, resource efficiency local environment, indoor environment. It considers building environmental quality and performance—a positive impact—and building loadings—a negative impact. CASBEE ranks efficiencies in five categories.

The industry is embracing rating tools. Most rating systems are very young and evolving. Each system strives to be responsive to its national concerns, regulations and conditions, but they have weaknesses. The limited building types covered are a common complaint that organizations are addressing. There is also a tension between ease of use and thoroughness. For example, lack of life cycle assessment in LEED troubles critics. Yet, this would make LCCD more difficult to use and perhaps not readily accepted.

Another concern is that the process can lead to a checklist mentality Rather than encouraging out of the box thinking, the rating system may actually limit the scope of consideration. The checkbox approach leads to an all or nothing score on each parameter. This leads to "arcane and sometimes arbitrary rules about their award," notes lan Butterss of Faithful & Gould. "Tick-box schemes are also difficult to use as graduated incentives for improvement."

Council House 2

Designing Green

Green building requires a holistic design approach. Integrated design, views the entire building as a system and recognizes that design choices in one area often affect other building systems. By using system interactions, designers can maximize the overall building performance. Some green design features, like exposed thermal mass, require the highly collaborative, multidiscipline approach.

Atkinson notes that "pursuit of energy efficiency in isolation of other environmental impacts can create sick buildings for occupants."

This change from the more traditional design approach is not a new idea. It is critical to successful green design and requires a significant process change. Patel thinks it is not a question of will green design change the design and construction process, but "how fast will the change occur."

Designing green requires a green products and materials supply chain. In Australia, procuring them is "one of the greatest challenges facing green designers," notes Atkinson. Unlike North America, Australia has a relatively small manufacturing sector. The USGBC achievements "influencing the supply and manufacturing chain are difficult to replicate in Australia." This is one of the differences national rating systems must recognize.

However, Atkinson sees the GBC of India working with its manufacturing sector as "an exciting model for the Asia Pacific Region. India may produce green technologies, products and materials at competitive market rates for countries like Australia to import."

Governments, while promoting green design, can stifle it through codes and requirements. An often cited problem is obtaining approval to use waterless urinals. Another common problem is approval for greywater recycling.

The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has contradictory policies, notes Patel. They promote green power generation, while discouraging all forms of green power generated on site by charging higher rates should a project use forms of on-site generation. The higher rates effectively make it uneconomical to employ the technologies.

Costing Green

When not mandated or incentivized by government, persuading the property industry that green is cost beneficial remains a challenge. The short-term focus of most property owners is a real barrier. The capital and operating expenditure funding disconnect also creates difficulties. When funding does not consider whole life costs, demonstrable tangible benefits—such as reduced operating costs—requiring additional capital are seldom funded. Intangible benefits are rarely part of any value consideration.

The debate about the capital costs of green design continues. However, the real discussion should be about whole life costs.

"Sometimes, there is the perception that green buildings cost substantially more. However, this would be contrary to the root of sustainability. A fundamental premise of green buildings is to use fewer natural resources," says Patel.

It is possible to achieve many LEED points at no or very low initial cost, but some points add initial cost. As a generalization, there may be a 2 to 3 percent premium associated with the LEED Silver certification standard. Butterss notes this is the similar expected increase "for the achievement of BREEAM Excellent in the UK, site issues permitting."

Per capita comparative statistics


Click here to return to top of screen


Cost engineering for projects
(in a worldwide economy)

Presented at the 3rd SENET Project Management Conference, Bratislava, Slovakia, 22-24 September 2004.

Dr Kenneth K Humphreys

Introduction

ICEC Secretary-Treasurer Ken Humphreys

Eight years ago I spoke at the 14th International Cost Engineering Congress in Guadalajara on the subject of international project costs and was quite honored when the Congress attendees selected my paper to receive the Jan Korevaar Outstanding Paper Award. Two years later in Rotterdam at the 15th International Congress I presented another paper on international projects and once again my paper was chosen to receive the award.

I suspect that much of the reason that my papers were selected to receive these awards was more due to ever growing interest in international economic considerations for projects than to the quality of my writing or to my speaking ability.

We can no longer consider anything we do on projects as a purely national thing which is constrained by the borders of our own country and by a single currency. Everything we do must be considered in light of international economics. Project managers must know cost engineering principles and understand the consequences of bad cost management decisions.

Industrial firms are increasingly multinational, and many companies now build and operate plants in several nations. Economic cooperation agreements between nations, such as the European Economic Community (EEC), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) are encouraging further industrial globalization. In January 2002, twelve European countries encompassing 31 states and territories abandoned their national currencies in favor of a common currency, the euro. The franc, lira, guilder, deutschemark, and several other currencies are no more. Ten more countries are scheduled to adopt the euro by 2006 and seven more may adopt it within the next five years. Twenty-seven other countries have fixed their currencies to the euro. Denmark, Sweden, and the United Kingdom are the only major holdouts in Europe to adopting the euro but it is probably inevitable that, in time, they will have no choice but to do so. International economic pressures and competitiveness will force them to join the rest of Europe in the conversion.

Pressures such as this and the interrelated nature of world economies are making it increasingly important for project control professionals to be familiar with techniques for estimating costs in other countries and to be able to compare costs in different nations. The questions that are always being asked are: "What will this plant cost in the home country?" "What about Canada, Great Britain, South Africa, and Australia?" and "Which location is the most attractive financially?" In today's world, projects cannot be effectively managed unless such questions can be answered with a reasonable degree of reliability. Companies must know the best location for projects in order to succeed economically. We can no longer assume that our own country is the best location. If we do, a competitor will build elsewhere, produce products and services at lower cost than we can, and import those products and services into our country and price them at less than we can. They will own the market. We will lose it. I could cite many examples where this has happened but that is not necessary. Anyone can readily think of examples where this has happened and where businesses have failed or shut down because they could no longer compete with foreign competitors.

A good estimator or cost engineer can readily develop the estimate for a plant in the home country, but such is not always the case for other nations. While cost engineers, quantity surveyors, and project managers are generally very familiar with major sources of cost data in their own country, they are often unaware of useful sources of cost data and related information in other countries. This problem is exacerbated by lack of time to perform a proper search, publications in various languages, and lack of information about key factors that can impact the estimate for particular geographic locations.

This paper which I presented in Guadalajara provided some insight into the availability of international cost data and location factors. It included:

  1. Descriptions of multicountry data sources for preliminary or conceptual cost studies;
  2. A list of database sources of unit price/cost data for specific countries,; and
  3. Some examples of resources available for international project studies

The complete paper is available on the Internet on the the web site of the International Cost Engineering Council. The information sources described in that paper are primarily periodical publications of various types. I do not intend to repeat the content of that paper today. It is easily available to all of you on the Internet. However I do wish to summarize a few of the conclusions made in that paper and the subsequent Rotterdam paper.

Limitations of published data

Published cost information must always be used with care. Every location factor or commonly available cost index has its own underlying method of construction, with its particular inherent components and weightings. It is vital for the estimator using such quick-estimate data to understand how it was created, and to recognize just what its limitations and applications are. Published data also is often inadequately explained and is frequently improperly dated. Date of publication is meaningless because the data may be months or years old and may require adjustment to current cost levels. Equipment cost data may or may not include ancillaries and/or transportation and installation costs, etc. Too often it seems that in the rush to complete the assignment, people will grasp any number they can find without fully understanding how it was derived, or what it represents.

With location factors, one must recognize that they generally reflect only the relative cost to replicate a facility exactly in another location. The factors do not consider cost effects which are introduced by site-unique conditions such as climate, earthquake and geological considerations, etc. If the design is not identical in both locations, location factors alone do not account for all of the cost differences.

Background studies

In order for a proper estimate to be made of a particular international project, it is vital to understand the conditions existing in the country or countries where a project is to be located. In a 1978 paper presented at the Fifth International Cost Engineering Congress, Utrecht, Netherlands, C.G. Walker outlined the major economic system parameters to be evaluated as follows:

Political: stability; attitude towards foreign investment; type of bureaucracy;
Finance: banking system; insurance regulations; tax system; duties;
Legal System: laws governing conduct of business and individual freedom;
Social System: business ethics; education; language and religion;
Geography: infrastructure and communication; climate; and
Industry: capacity; diversity; efficiency.

Many other authors have discussed site- or country-specific factors that can impact the cost, schedule, and/or price for an international project. These include: local material quality/availability, labor availability, equipment availability, labor productivity, import duties, import licenses, local taxes, language, length of workweek, holidays, inflation, fluctuating exchange rates, religious customs, buy-local laws, shipping cycles, weather/climatic impacts, workforce level of education, logistics, workforce housing, and many other relevant factors. Regional variations of these factors within a country must also be expected, and remoteness/distance from major cities or supply centers can often aggravate the above problems even further.

Internation location factors

When little time is available or warranted to perform appropriate background studies, and detailed design and engineering have not been completed, estimators must turn to published indexes, location factors, or other sources of relevant data for help.

A location factor is an instantaneous, overall, total cost factor for converting a base project cost from one geographic location to another. This factor recognizes differences in productivity and costs for labor, engineered equipment, bulk materials, commodities, freight, duty, taxes, indirects and project administration. The cost of land, scope/design differences for local regulations and codes and differences in operating philosophies are not included in the location factor.

With the current rush of industries attempting to globalize, use of location factors has become increasingly important. Location factors should be used to factor a base estimate for comparing costs at differing locations and not for the funding estimate for the selected location. After selection, a higher quality estimate should be developed for project funding.

Many countries do not have the capability to manufacture certain specialized equipment and routinely import this material. So the degree of local vs. import and the relative cost differences need to be part of the location factor calculation. Many companies use U.S. costs and apply percentages for freight, import duties and customs and broker fees. Two other issues that should be considered are:

  1. importing of certain items because of quality or scheduling problems; and
  2. importing and paying the associated costs (if local regulations so allow) of materials from another country because local manufacturing costs are high.

These items can greatly affect the material and equipment costs for an actual project. The location factor needs to reflect the above considerations and expected or known strategies with the factors being adjusted accordingly.

Local monetary rates, productivity differentials and benefits and burdens vary enormously by individual country. Governmental employment regulations, rules for foreign workers, travel and support costs, and religious and cultural differences must be carefully evaluated. All can impact a location cost factor program.

Project elements checklist

The planning and execution of an international project requires many special considerations not usually encountered when planning within your own country. There are the obvious differences such as wage rates, productivity, duties, and taxes, but many more differences may be overlooked. To properly prepare an international estimate and to avoid unpleasant surprises requires that you conduct research on construction practices in the target country. The following checklist presents many of the differences that need to be considered and recommended actions which should be taken in order to insure development of a reliable and accurate estimate.

Project Design

  1. What local codes and practices apply to the project design? For example, do you construct prefabricated steel buildings or concrete block buildings?
  2. What weather and climatic conditions are likely to prevail at the project site? How do these differ from your home country? Is the project location subject to temperature extremes, severe rainfall, flooding, etc.? (eg, Monsoons in Southeast Asia; frost levels in the north: permafrost in the far north)
  3. Must consideration be given to any special geological conditions such as earthquake zones, unusual soil conditions, etc?
  4. What will be the language of the contract documents - contracts, drawings, etc?
Bulk Materials
  1. What materials are available locally? Is the quality adequate? For example, in some sandy desert areas such as Saudi Arabia local sand may not be suitable for use in cement and concrete. Sand may have to be imported. It may sound like sending coal to Newcastle but it isn't - it can be a major concern.
  2. Is it cheaper to buy locally or import? Before the devaluation of the Mexican peso, there were situations when it was actually less expensive to import reinforcing steel into Mexico than to purchase it there. In some situations there may be a VAT on local materials while the project is exempt from duties. This may make it cheaper to import than buy locally. Often owners can take title to goods at the point of import and avoid duties and taxes. Also, owners can sometimes recover the VAT.
  3. Should you use different practices? For instance, if construction labor costs are very low, it may be more economical to fabricate rebar at the site rather than at the factory. Similarly, in some areas hand mixing and placing of concrete may be more economical that using ready-mixed concrete.
Engineered (Process) Equipment
  1. While equipment pricing tends to be international in nature, there are places in the world that are more competitive than others. Example - for one project a few years ago, a gas turbine generator was priced at US $14,000,000 if purchased in the US but if ordered in India it could be bought from the same US company for US $12,000,000 because of competition.
    If possible, obtain quotes for your specific location rather than using recent pricing in other geographic areas. If information from other areas must be used or if importing of equipment is required, be sure to factor in shipping costs and duties from each potential supplier location.
  2. Be sure to evaluate the total cost in selecting your equipment supplier. In addition to the base price, you should consider shipping costs, duties and exchange rates.
  3. Be sure to evaluate your spare parts requirements. Due to long delivery times for certain components, particularly those which must be imported, you may want to stock more spares. For example, one US-based company maintains a spares inventory of about US $500,000 for its gas turbine generator projects. For their projects in other countries, they allow US $2,000,000 for spares.
Construction Labor
  1. Is there skilled labor available? Does the labor force have the skills needed for the project? Skilled trades people may be available but technically trained people may not be available.
  2. What is the local productivity? While there are several publications that quote average productivity compared to a base location such as the Houston Gulf Coast Area of the United States, wide variances may exist in actual productivity in any given location abroad. For example, in Saudi Arabia, the average labor productivity factor is about 1.6 versus the US Gulf Coast but may vary from being similar to that of the US to over 3.0 depending upon project conditions and the mix of local and expatriate labor. Within the US, productivity also varies widely.
  3. Will you be required to provide housing and services, such as medical facilities, as a part of your construction program? In some areas, meals and shower facilities are required. In Brazil, for example, breakfast, luncheon, and transportation to the job site are usually required.
  4. How do you obtain local labor? You may be required to pay fees to a labor broker for staffing your project. Subcontracting may be preferable.
  5. What are local payroll taxes and benefit costs? They can exceed 100% of payroll in some countries.
  6. Should you import construction labor? Is it legal to import labor?
Construction Equipment
  1. Is construction equipment available locally? If so, what is the cost? If equipment is in short supply, the costs may be much higher than in your home country.
  2. If you need to bring in equipment, will you be required to pay duties? Sometimes duties can be avoided by posting a bond to guarantee that you will export the equipment when the job is complete.
  3. What are the rules for removing equipment after the project? Sometimes exporting will be prohibited - this is a big potential risk.
  4. Are the local construction forces trained in the use of the equipment? In some areas workers may not know how to use power tools. Hand tools may be required.
  5. Supposedly trained local workers may not have adequate skills. On a recent Chinese project, over 70% of people holding Chinese certificates of qualifications were unable to do the work for which they were hired.
Construction Management Staffing
  1. What positions will be filled with expatriates versus local hires? Use of expatriates is expensive. A rule of thumb is double US cost, ie, about US $25,000 per person per year. Preferably, expats should be bilingual. Seek out bilingual local hires for trial as possible permanent employees.
  2. What living arrangements will be provided (camp versus local housing) and what is the cost? Will food be a per diem expense or will workers be fed in a galley? What about security - a gated camp? Alarm? Home systems?
  3. What special services, such as housekeepers, drivers, etc, are required?
Schedule
  1. How long will project mobilization take? Project mobilization may take longer than normal if you are setting up a base camp, bringing in construction equipment, etc.
  2. What is the schedule effect of equipment delivery time? Allow for additional delivery time for imported equipment to cover ocean freight, offloading and customs clearance and possible delivery to the site. A self-unloading ship may be required if port facilities are not adequate.
  3. Will weather introduce any special schedule considerations? Be aware of local weather conditions, such as monsoon periods in the tropics, that may delay the schedule.
  4. How will local productivity, work practices (eg, carnival), culture, religion (eg, prayer breaks), and workforce level of education affect schedules?
Local Infrastructure Requirements
  1. Are local water, sewer, electricity and other services available? If not, will on-site facilities (eg, generators) be required. In China, for example, local water is generally available but it will contain sediment and will not be potable.
  2. Are highways and rail service available? Are they adequate or do they require upgrades? Roads and bridges, for example, may not be able to carry large loads.
  3. Are there relocation requirements for people living on the site? What are these relocation requirements? Often people must be relocated and be provided with new housing. Consider the Three Gorges Dam project in China which will displace 1.13 million people.
  4. Can the local port handle the cargo? Is the depth adequate? Is the dock adequate? Can the cranes handle your loads? Will self-unloading ships or crane barges be required?
Material & Equipment Delivery (Shipping & Customs)
  1. Should shipments be consolidated? Consolidation of shipments can save significant shipping cost but can impact your schedule.
  2. What fees are required for customs clearance? They can be significant. In Brazil, for example, nine different types of taxes and fees must be considered. Similar situations are common in other countries.
  3. The costs of importing can be very significant, but exceptions are often available and need to be explored. India, for example, levies duties of 40 to 100 percent or more yet has granted concessional rates as low as 20 percent for recent power projects.
  4. Some items may be restricted for import requiring use of locally manufactured items. For example, in China switchgear and fire protection equipment must be Chinese made.
  5. What is the cost of transit insurance to move the equipment to the site?
  6. How will you get the equipment from the port to the site (rail, highway, barge)? If you are moving the equipment by highway, can the roads and bridges handle the loads or do they need reinforcement or bypass? Is there special equipment available to handle the heavy loads (off the ship and on the highway)? It can be necessary to build an airfield and fly the equipment in.
  7. Do freighter schedules meet your project schedule? Heavy lift ships have limited availability and, if required, may present schedule problems.
  8. What security is required to ensure that your equipment arrives at the site? Is theft a potential problem? Must equipment be guarded?
  9. Do you require special shipping due to project financing? For example, US export-import bank financing may require use of US flag ships at approximately a tripled freight cost.
Project Finance
  1. Does project financing require that a certain percentage of the project be purchased in certain countries? US export-import financing may impose such requirements.
  2. On joint ventures, get a majority interest. Otherwise local codes and standards will apply, and they are not necessarily of the level desired. On one Chinese project I am familiar with, building to Western design standards cost 5000 RMB/m2. If built to Chinese standards, it would have been 1500 RMB/m2.
Progress Payments (Cash Flow)
  1. What up-front payments will be required? Contractors in developing nations may be cash poor and may require a larger than normal up front payment to help with project operating capital. A 15 to 20% advance payment is not unusual. This may be necessary to enable them to buy materials. Funds may not be available locally to them and, if they are, the loan interest rates may be very high.
  2. If you are being paid by a foreign government, what kind of processing time can you assume for invoice payments? The bureaucracy can be very slow.
  3. What currency will you be paid in? If you are paid in local currency there will be a conversion fee and, on occasion, convertibility may not be available.
  4. If payment is in local currency, what risk exists for significant fluctuation in exchange rates or for changes in government policy which might affect exchange rates? Consider the four Asian countries (Thailand, Phillippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia), for example, which have suffered massive losses in the value of their currencies since mid-1997. All four currencies had a long history of stability before this sudden decline.
    A good contract clause is one that specifies that bids are to be adjusted for currency reevaluations, for example the change from pesos to new pesos in Mexico.
  5. What is the schedule of payments to local workers: daily, weekly, monthly?
Local Taxes
  1. What local business taxes must you pay for working in the country? Some countries levy substantial taxes in order to remove profits from the country.
  2. What local sales, property, VAT or other taxes will be assessed against your project? VAT is a tax on a tax. For example, the contractor buys materials and equipment and pays the VAT. The owner is billed and pays the VAT again. Sometimes the VAT can be refunded but it is best to avoid it if possible by the owner buying the materials directly (or by taking title at the time of import).
Insurance
  1. Does the local country allow for private insurance? China and India for example do not. If not, you may need to contract with government agencies in the host country for insurance rather than with your regular carrier.
  2. What special insurance is required for international freight losses? Marine freight insurance may be included to the site but what about project delays if equipment is lost? Insure for delays plus emergency replacement costs plus interest during construction delays.
  3. Is bonding available in the country? If not, a letter of credit may be required.
Legal Recourse
  1. What recourse do you have if your customer in the country defaults on the contract through cancellation, non-payment, bankruptcy, etc?
  2. What legal recourse do you have for non-performance of local subcontractors? Can they be bonded? What about lawsuits?
  3. What about permits? Often permission must be obtained from many government authorities before the project can commence. In Suzhou, China, the Lion Nathan Brewery, which opened in 1998, was required to obtain 41 different government construction permits.
Social System
  1. What local holidays are observed?
  2. Is family housing required at the job site? Indonesia, for example, is encouraging family status.
  3. How do local religious customs impact the work schedule? For example, are prayer breaks customary?
  4. What about local work customs such as long mid-day work breaks in some countries (eg, Mexico and Latin America) or exercise periods (eg, 1/2 hour per day in Japan)?

How do you begin

If you have never tackled a multi-national project before, the above list is certainly enough to discourage anyone from attempting it. Fortunately, there is a good support infrastructure to help you get started.

Most major industrial nations have the equivalent of a Department of Commerce. These government agencies have staffs that are well versed in helping you develop a plan and obtain the information you need for a successful project. You should begin your project by contacting one of these agencies and embassies of the countries involved for assistance.

You should consider a local partner or consultant in the host country. This person or company should have the ability to help you with the language, identify local rules and regulations that will apply to the project, and help you through the processes.

You will need help from someone skilled in local construction practices: a design firm, local contractor or just a special consultant. Discuss with this person the project logistics of local contractors vs. self perform, construction equipment, site housing requirements, local versus imported materials and labor, schedule, etc. to develop a project plan. To help locate this person or firm, you may wish to start with the International Cost Engineering Council (ICEC) and the International project management Association (IPMA). ICEC has 44 national member societies doing business in much of the world. Many other national associations have indicated their interest in becoming ICEC members. IPMA has member organizations in 34 countries, 11 IPMA members are also ICEC members. All of these organizations are willing to assist you. You can contact them via the ICEC website at http://www.icoste.org or the IPMA website at http://www.ipma.ch. The ICEC website provides a complete listing of ICEC members with e-mail links. A link is also provided to the IPMA site and to numerous other organizations which are concerned with project management and control.

Once you have put together your basic project plan, you will need to begin gathering the specific cost and schedule information required for the project. Here are some suggestions to help you compile the information:

  • For specific local pricing information, the best approach is to obtain bids from local contractors. Put together a bill of quantities and work through your local construction consultant to obtain the bids.
  • If you are working on a technology project in a developing country, do not assume that the contractors you are working with understand the project concepts and how they go together. You may get some very strange results if you just supply a list of quantities and ask for unit pricing. Educating your project subcontractors can provide much better results.
  • Before you visit your subcontractors provide them with the quantity list and give them some time to review it.
  • When you visit, take photographs of similar work, layouts and elevations of the proposed project, and a simple project schedule. If you have time lapse film of the construction of a similar facility, it will be of great value in educating the subcontractors.
  • When you visit the subcontractors, take time to sit with them and discuss the quantity list to make sure that they understand your terminology. Remember that an estimator who does not understand a project will be more conservative and will include greater contingencies in the estimate than may be justified.
  • For equipment pricing, be sure to remember to consider any specific country sourcing due to finance requirements. Look to multiple country sources for bids. Many times the equipment vendors can arrange special financing or in-country manufacturing to avoid duties or can provide other assistance to the project. Be specific that you will be evaluating the bids on a completed project cost basis and not merely on bid price.
  • Select a freight forwarding company early in the planning stage to help with the schedule logistics, freight costs and duty requirements for the project. These companies generally earn their fees, as travel consultants do, by commissions they receive from the freight lines. You should be able to find a company that will work with you on that basis. You should select a company that has offices in the countries of origin for your equipment and in the country where you will be working. The local agents will be very valuable with helping you through the customs and local transportation requirements.
  • There are several international consulting companies that provide information about taxes and business requirements around the world. Work through your regular accounting firm to identify a company to work with. You will need to obtain reports on local taxes and business issues for your project.
  • You will need to obtain an international attorney to help prepare the contracts, business plans and other legal documents for you to do business in your host country. It is important to find an attorney who is experienced in international law and preferably one who has done business in your host country before.

Conclusion

The best possible summary for this discussion is from John R. Barry's paper, "Ten Commandments of International Cost Engineering," presented at the 1993 Annual Meeting of AACE International:

The reliability of available data is usually suspect, so test, test, and retest it. Communication problems are difficult across cultures, and sometimes language differences can cause misunderstandings when soliciting data. The use of international factors is a session all its own. A few basic principles for guidance include keeping in mind that a time or place factor means nothing without an exchange rate and date and that a base city must be identifiable, since variation can exist within your home country.

The paper concluded with Barry's "Ten Commandments for Worldwide Cost Engineering," which have appeared in several of his articles over the years. They are a fitting conclusion to this paper as well.

John Barry's Ten Commandments for Worldwide Cost Engineering
  1. Thou shalt not begin an international cost engineering assignment without preparing for the differences in culture and protocol.
  2. Thou shalt not ignore investment objectives of the target country's government.
  3. Thou shalt not look at building your own facilities as the only way to enter business in a country.
  4. Thou shall not use biased estimated scope that does not reflect technical, cultural, legal, and climate differences.
  5. Thou shalt not ignore what equipment must be imported and the impact on cost and schedule.
  6. Thou shalt not accept as gospel cost data for other countries without thoroughly checking for understanding and testing for reasonableness.
  7. Thou shalt not ignore productivity, weather, religious practices, and construction methods when calculating labor cost.
  8. Thou shalt not ignore the additional risks associated with cost and schedule on international projects.
  9. Thou shalt not forget that ICEC and IPMA members are valuable resources who are capable and willing to help.
  10. Thou shalt not ignore the previous nine commandments.

Multi-national projects carry many risks, but as economies become more global, the potential reward from international projects will become greater. This list of activities and recommendations is far from complete, but it does cover most of the more significant items of concern. If you begin working with these recommendations, you will have the tools needed to make you a successful international project manager.

Dr Kenneth K Humphreys
Secretary Treasurer
International Cost Engineering Council


Click here to return to top of screen


Public-private partnership as a basis of the development of public procurement

JUDr Ing Jirí Vlach

Abstract

The process of public procurement is a typical case of a project that should be managed by means of project management. In the preparation phase there is the year’s plan of procurement and its audit ex-ante, the necessity-statement of the object’s procurement, the specification of the object and choice of the method. The competition phase serves to the selection of the contractor. It begins with the public announcement of the tender and ends with the signing of the contract. The main activity is to elaborate the tender dossier and correct evaluate all the bids, finding the best value for money without any discrimination and with the best possible transparency. The last realisation phase after the contract signing ends with the complex evaluation of the project and with audit ex-post. The persons acting in public procurement in Slovakia must be qualified, but project-manager-certification is not obligatory asked and project management does not build an obligatory part of the education program of the buyers. The participation of certificated project managers in public procurement process and necessity of education of buyers in project management is discussed.

Keywords:public procurement, certificated project managers

Partnerships between the public and private sectors, in both social and economic spheres, establish a fundamental basis of further development and improvement of society. This phenomenon is currently applied in all spheres of activity in societies worldwide as the essential element and crucial impetus for further growth of the societies. Numerous political,administrative and civic, both universal and specialized, agencies, organisations and corporations at the national and international levels work to encourage partnerships between public and private sector officials. Although the partnerships are helpful for all countries including developed countries, they may be particularly useful for the development of the countries in transition. As regards public-private partnerships, countries with developed economies are ahead of the countries in transition. However, that may be beneficial for the countries in transition because they can draw on experience of the developed countries to make quicker and correct decisions and implement the public-private partnerships.

Public-Private Partnership in Public Procurement

One of the areas where public-private partnerships are often utilized is public procurement. It is an acceptable public procurement practice because the very essence of public procurement is economic and ethical relationships between the public and private sectors.

Public sector officials purchase goods, services and works necessary for society, from private suppliers and use public funds (i.e. citizen’s money administered by the public officials) to pay for it. Public officials, or in this case "contracting authorities", are obliged to make sure they purchase only those things that are really needed with regard to their function and quality, and purchase it in the most economical way possible. This obligation is based on the "best value for money" principle, i.e. to achieve the required (adequate) value for the money spent.

A private businessman as a supplier of these goods, services or works needed in society, i.e. the "bidder", is interested to be awarded the public contract (which will improve its position in the market) and also, to deliver the goods under the contract with the highest profit possible in the market. If the bidder can make even more than that, it is willing to share this "more" with another entity that can help him to receive such a beneficial contract. It is not the purpose of this paper now to say whether it should be called an expression of gratitude, "tip", bribe or any other sort of corruption, cronyism or mafia-kind of behaviour, or how to prevent or punish such behaviour.

As regards the application of public-private partnerships, any inappropriate conduct in public procurement that increases the public expenditures above the usual market level is socially undesired and dangerous, and as such is punishable as a criminal act. That is why such behaviour is not public; it is kept in secret and not disclosed in the documentation or accountable receipts of either the contracting authority or the supplier. Under such circumstances it is very difficult to prove such misconduct and only a very a few cases can be brought before the court. However, such conduct is very dangerous for society. If it is not treated as a misdemeanour, an antisocial act, or even as a criminal offence, it will spontaneously encourage its repetition without punishment and corruption will become a habit. Again, this is not what this paper wants to focus on.

If a businessman applying for public contracts achieves its goal (i.e. gets the contract and makes an adequate profit), it has no reason – in a healthy market environment! – to give to the staff of the contracting authority who has any influence on the award of the contract a bribe in the form of a secret "returning" of the difference between the higher price awarded in the contract and the usual market price of the goods procured. Quite the opposite, the entrepreneur fears such behaviour might be disclosed, and is concerned by the potential social and criminal consequences, pressure to repeat such behaviour in the future, or the possibility of future blackmail. The businessman does not have to worry about all that if it achieves its interests in the usual market conditions. But the businessman needs to know whether it can count on correct and non-corrupt conduct of the contracting authorities in the future procurement cases.

With regard to its interest in correct public procurement the private businessman applying for public contracts becomes an important element in the fight for socially beneficial and noncorrupt public procurement, an economical use of public funds, and efficient social life. A major role in this society-wide effort (apart from a number of other means, such as legislation, pressure on the economical use of public funds through public budgets and audits of their results, criminal and labour penalties, higher qualifications and ethical standards of the contracting authorities) is played exactly by public-private partnerships that are manifested through public declarations of anti-corruption agreements, enforcement of ethics codes or application of integrity pacts in major public procurement cases. It can be noted with satisfaction that public partnerships are acknowledged and supported not only in developed democracies, but their implementation can be now observed little by little also in Slovakia.

Under the auspices of the EU Ambassador to Slovakia, Slovak Prime Minister and Transparency International Slovakia an anti-corruption agreement has been signed by a few dozens of major businesses in Slovakia. Moreover, contracting authorities and major bidders have begun drafting and enforcing codes of ethics, also anti-corruption and information basics on the public procurement process have been published and declared and samples of Integrity. Pacts of contracting authorities and bidders made available. Despite all those efforts, however, it is still too early to evaluate the results delivered by public-private partnerships in Slovakia.

Project Management in Public Procurement

We must keep in mind that public procurement is a complex social, economic and organisational process of management that fully meets the definition of a „project“ as used in the project management terminology. And as such, if this process should meet its goals, it is recommended that both the contracting authority and bidder manage the process with project management methods.

In the light of the above, as qualified specialists in the project management we must keep emphasizing the complexity of every public procurement project from its beginning to its end. This is necessary because under the influence of the Slovak legislation (Public Procurement Act) and a narrow scope of the competencies of the Public Procurement Office key attention is paid only to that part of the process that deals with the selection of the supplier, i.e. that part of the process that starts with the determination of the procurement method and ends with the signing of the contract. But as any other project, also a public procurement project has its preparation, pre-selection of bidders, and implementation and evaluation phases.

The project management principles are least observed in the preparation phase in which social needs and possibilities of satisfying of the needs are being determined.

In the pre-project part of the preparation phase the contracting authority formulates its needs and possibilities of public procurement as a whole. This part includes mainly drawing up a public procurement plan, review of the plan by an independent audit ex-ante, incorporating the plan in the budget of the authority, and publishing these documents. In respect of organisation, samples of documents in the sequence of the steps to be taken in the public procurement process must be prepared and published (and updated in the following years) and the information system for public procurement must be implemented (if possible, this information system should be part of the global information system of the authority). As far as ethics are concerned, the Code of Public Procurement should be drawn up and declared, as well as Integrity Pacts for important cases of public procurement.

The project phase of the preparation phase is concerned with individual cases of procurement and attention is concentrated on designing tender documents, mainly their key segments, i.e.the accurate specification of the purchased goods, conditions for participation of bidders in the selection process, criteria for the selection of the best offer. The design of the tender documents is the most difficult part of the procurement process because it is a laborious process requiring the most qualified work. The analyses of wrong, insufficient and incorrect procurement cases (that often get media coverage too) show that it is exactly inappropriately prepared tender documents that are the main cause of bad tenders, regardless of whether the insufficient preparation of the documents was caused by a lack of knowledge or qualifications, or negligence, lack of care or involvement of the staff designing the document, or even a bad intention of the staff. Inappropriately prepared tender documents almost always open the door to cronyism, bribery, corruption and mafia practices. The effort to design good and qualified tender documents is best helped if the documents are publicized.

The selection phase of procurement, i.e. the selection procedure and the sequence of the steps is thoroughly specified in the law and is subject to administrative control. It is therefore a phase that is the most monitored phase and gets most media coverage. The main steps in this phase are the advertising of the tender, preparation and submitting the bids, appointment of the members of the selection commission and the evaluation of the bids by the commission choosing the winning bidder, followed by potential compliant procedure, and –on the end of the process - the signing of the contract. Fears from potential penalty for breach of rules set forth for this phase cause that the contracting authorities overestimate the administrative part of the process at the expense of the effort to select the best bid. The sign of distortion in public procurement in Slovakia is an inadequately high number of complaints (as compared with the developed countries) that are filed by bidders against the procedure of the contracting authority after the bidders find out they have not won the tender. This protracts the length of the procurement process, which causes difficulties to the contracting authorities. According to the Public Procurement Office the majority of the complaints filed in Slovakia is unsubstantiated.

Not enough attention is paid to the implementation phase. Lack of attention concerns mainly annexes to the contracts and checks of the quality of the supplied goods or services, which very often results in a failure to meet the societal goals of the public procurement. However, the failure of the procurement is discovered only at the final evaluation of the procurement when it is too late and nothing can be done against it. This happens because the changes executed in this phase are not subject to strict procurement laws and it is possible to use a simple non-public agreement to change the initial criteria for the selection of the best value bid (and thereby violate the original correctness of the tender), but also change the qualitative indicators of the supply or even the specification of the goods. That is why this phase is "discreetly" abused by various corruption practices and cronyism.

Another phase remaining outside the realm of public interest is the evaluation phase, which causes insufficient review and checks on whether the initial objective, i.e. a proper satisfaction of the societal need, has been met, and whether it has been met in an economical and efficient manner. The sign of this lack of interest in the post-project phase is that no independent audit ex-post is required to review the results of the procurement process as well as the level of fulfilment of the procurement plan.

So far we have tackled public procurement cases from the point of view of the contracting authority as one party to the procurement and the contractual relationship. The other party in this process are bidders for public contracts, and later the contractor as the winning bidder.

Also from the point of view of the other party procurement is a project that requires the application of project management. In the preparation phase the bidder takes the decision to participate in the tender. The main element of the selection phase is drawing up a qualified bid that offers the supply in accordance with the specification and procurement conditions and selection criteria, and if the bidder wins the contract, this phase is concluded with the signing of the contract. The key phase from the point of view of the supplier is the implementation phase in which the supplier provides for the performance under the contract. The fulfilment of the goals of the supplier will be reviewed in the evaluation phase. A responsible performance of the contract strengthens the contractor’s image in the market and the achievement of an adequate market profit provides for its economic stability. There is no doubt that the common interest of both parties (the contracting authority as well as bidders) in a healthy marketeconomy is to achieve a successful and smooth course of their projects and fulfilment of their project objectives. It is this common interest to achieve the project objectives in public procurement that is the basis for an efficient functioning of a public-private partnership.

Project Qualification of Contracting Authorities

The application of project management as a specific field of management is reflected in a successful preparation and implementation of procurement projects. Procurement cases, i.e. individual projects, can be managed well by those who are appropriately trained and qualified for such management. Under the Slovak public procurement law public procurement may be carried out only by persons with appropriate qualifications who have received a certificate of training and have been entered in the register of the Public Procurement Office of persons competent for procurement. However, these competent persons are currently trained and certified only in the knowledge of the public procurement law (i.e. only for the phase of the selection of the supplier) and no other certification of a project manager is required from them, nor is project management made part of their training. This must be considered a shortcoming in their qualification in case of more complex procurement projects. A qualified preparation and implementation of public procurement on the part of the contracting authority as well as equally qualified approach of the contractor constitutes one of the foundation stones of a public-private partnership in procurement.

Public-Civic Partnerships in Public Procurement

So far we have discussed a partnership in public procurement from the position of contracting authorities and private bidders, i.e. business applying for public contracts, and we have come to the conclusion that in a healthy market both these parties are interested in a correct procurement process and are willing to support it in their own interest. The civic society – that is citizens as the carriers of the democratic political power, representatives of social ethics and morality, and a source of the public funds – is also interested in public matters and in how the public funds are used. If we succeed in involving the civic society in the efforts for correct public procurement, then we can speak of the partnership of the contracting authorities (whom we expect to ensure fulfilment of the societal needs and a good use of public money, i.e. the money belonging to all citizens that was delegated to their care) and the citizens, i.e. the civic society as the end users of the societal needs procured, directly participating in the ethics of society and last but not least, citizens as the source of public funds. The higher the level of democracy in society, the higher the citizen’s interest not only in the fulfilment of the societal needs but also in a better use of the public funds and a higher level of the social ethics and morality, as well as the interest in a correct procurement process. Therefore, a certain level of an economic democracy significantly increases the possibilities, scope and the results of a public-private partnership (we can be more accurate: "a public-civic" partnership), in particular in public procurement.

To initiate the citizen’s interest in a good management of "their" public money and citizen interest in an effective fulfilment of the needs of citizens and a life in an ethical and moral environment, we must encourage their decision to take interest in public procurement through providing them sufficient information about the whole process of public procurement. That is the issue of the information transparency of public procurement. The citizens should be able to get easy access to the information about the procurement plans of individual contracting authorities and the incorporation of the plan in their budget, information on the tenders and their conditions and criteria, tender documents in major procurement projects and the evaluation of the bids, signed contracts as well as the evaluation of the procurement plans and results of an independent audit of the plans. From the point of view of the ethical approach to the procurement process this can be ensured through a publication of information in the code of ethics of individual contracting authorities, provision of samples of their integrity pacts for major procurement projects, appointment of the members of the selection commission and prevention of any conflict of interest of the members, and the complaints against the procedure of the contracting authority. The most advantageous form of transparency of the information is its posting on websites of contracting authorities. The guidelines of transparent publication of procurement information can be found in brochures published by Transparency International Slovakia 10.

Transparency of information on public procurement is just one side of the interest in public-civic partnership. The other side is the use of the transparently publicized information to examine the correctness of the procurement process, requiring of correction of the found incorrectness in procedures of individual contracting authorities and the pressure to improve the organization of the system of procurement and its transparency. In USA the so-called "whistle-blowing" is successfully used: citizens who inform on any wrong use of public funds get 10% of the public funds that was, or was going to be inappropriately used. Various civic associations and interest organisations as well as the media play an important role in this.

Conclusion

The Public-Private Partnership is very helpful in numerous areas of life. It can be initiated and its results used in public procurement between contracting authorities and bidders, and also between the contracting authorities and citizens also in the application of the project management on the part of both contracting authorities and bidders. As opposed to developed countries, Slovakia is only beginning to use these partnerships. The use of the experience of the developed countries, however, may accelerate the progress.

JUDr. Ing.Jirí Vlach, PhD.
Transparency International Slovakia
vlachj@bmail.sk


Click here to return to top of screen


Click here to return to the Table of Contents

Click here to return to the Main Menu


PO Box 301
Deakin West ACT 2600
AUSTRALIA
National Surveyors House
27 - 29 Napier Close
Deakin ACT AUSTRALIA

icec.jpg